Portfolios to Webfolios and Beyond: Levels of Maturation
Click
here for the entire text
|
Paul Gathercoal, Ph.D.
California Lutheran University
gatherco@clunet.edu
|
Douglas O. Love, Ph.D.
Illiniois State University
dolove@ilstu.edu
|
Gerry McKean, Ph.D.
Illinois State University
gwmckea@ilstu.edu
|
- Webfolios may have the most significant effect on
education since the introduction of formal schooling.
- This article will chronicle the journey from paper
and e-portfolios to webfolios and it will define five levels of maturation.
- A taxonomy for the “Determination of Levels of Maturation”
is included and can be used to ascertain a particular educational institution’s
level of maturation and concomitantly, provide a conceptual guidance framework
for attaining the highest level of maturation.

- By analyzing and categorizing
eight physical and theoretical qualities inherent in the portfolio/webfolio
processes and applications the authors have determined the five Levels of
Maturation.

- As well, the authors have considered six value-oriented
issues associated with the portfolio/webfolio processes and applications in
establishing each of the Levels of Maturation.

- By
applying these criteria to the portfolio/webfolio process and application,
we have been able to identify five Levels of Maturation.

- Different
programs within educational institutions can operate at various levels of
maturation simultaneously.
Figure 1. provides
a series of affirming statements that when assessed with a “Yes” this is present
or a “No” this is not present, can be used to ascertain an educators or an educational
institutions’ Level of Maturation.
- Their portfolio
is simply a collection of selected assignments completed in a course or awards
they received along the way.
- The organization
of the student portfolio is chaotic.
- The feedback
students receive on their Level 1 portfolios is usually limited to comments
and grades displayed on the work samples.
- Student decisions
on what to include in the Level 1 portfolio depends on the student and how
she or he feels about a particular work sample.
- At best, the
student provides a time-based context for each item in the scrapbook.
- Other than a
collection device, the portfolio may be of no other value to the student.
- The Level 1
portfolio is of little value to the educator and of no value to the educational
institution. The Level 1 portfolio or scrapbook process
does not assure digital equity and scrapbooks are relatively expensive as
they are difficult to maintain, organize and distribute and the student must
continually develop a new one each time he or she updates it.
TABLE 1. provides
a summary of qualities used to describe portfolios, e-portfolios and webfolios
at Maturation Level l – Scrapbook.
- At Level 2,
a cadre of educators or the institution itself has identified a curricular
framework or template that will help students to organize and construct their
portfolios.
- The educational
authority determines the organization of the Level 2 portfolio and students
merely conform to this organization as a matter of making it through the program.
- The items that
will appear in the Level 2 portfolio will range from the scrapbook type entries
to multi-media presentations in the e-portfolio and webfolio versions.
- The student’s
heuristic process is limited to the confines of the template provided by the
institution or program.
- While the organization
of the Level 2 portfolio does provide some contextual clues about the artifacts,
the student provides most of the context as she or he describes each item
and how it meets some standard or program requirement.
- The Level 2
paper and e-portfolio must be hand delivered to interested others.
The webfolio version enjoys the ability to be electronically transmitted
anytime and anywhere.
- The value to
employers and students is high.
- The value to
educators is moderate as they will instantly be able to see if students can
generate work samples that address institutional standards or program requirements.
- The Level 2
portfolios are of low value to the educational institution. The
Level 2 portfolio or curriculum vitae does not assure digital equity when
displayed in the paper or e-portfolio versions. The Level
2 webfolio version allows the educational institution to ensure every student
has equitable access to communication and information resources, and the learning
opportunities that are provided within the webfolio system. The paper
and e-portfolio versions of the Level 2 portfolio are relatively expensive
as they are difficult to maintain and organize and the student must continually
develop a new one each time he or she updates it. The Level
2 webfolio’s expense is low as the student can assign and reassign access
to a variety of constituencies, she or he can modify items within the webfolio
system and they are instantly updated for all to see, and there is no delivery
cost to the student.
TABLE 2. provides
a summary of qualities used to describe portfolios, e-portfolios and webfolios
at Maturation Level 2 – Curriculum Vitae.
- At Level 3,
paper and e-portfolios do not exist.
- The items in
the Level 3 webfolio can either be part of a working or a showcase webfolio
and the student makes this determination.
- The context
for Level 3 webfolios is rich with input from educators, students and the
educational institution itself.
- The delivery
of the student’s webfolio to educators, mentors or employers is instantaneous
with the permission to access their work.
- The value of
the Level 3 webfolio is high for students, educators and employers.
- The Level 3
webfolio’s probability of digital equity is highly likely, as the educational
institution will ensure every student has equitable access to communication
and information resources, and the learning opportunities provided within
the system.
- The expense
of the Level 3 webfolio is low as the student can assign and reassign access
to a variety of constituencies, she or he can modify items within the webfolio
system and they are instantly updated for all to see, and there is no delivery
cost to the student.
TABLE 3. provides
a summary of qualities used to describe webfolios at Maturation Level 3 – Curriculum
Collaboration between student and faculty.
- Level 4 webfolios
are organized by curricular requirements and electives or standards that are
established by a cadre of educators or the institution; but they also allow
students to generate their own portals for displaying work samples and achievements
within the same curricular structure or institutional standard.
- Work samples
and achievements can either be part of a working or a showcase webfolio.
- The Level 4
webfolio context is even richer than preceding levels as there are descriptions
from educators, students, and the educational institution and from student
generated webfolio items.
- The delivery
of a student’s webfolio is instantaneous when he or she gives permission to
various groups of registered users to access work samples and achievements.
- The Level 4
webfolio is of high value for students, educators and employers.
- The educator
benefits greatly from the ability to repeat and enhance instructional implementation
by copying course syllabi and assignments from one semester to the next, each
time enriching the content through additional resources and new curricular
initiatives.
- The probability
of digital equity is highly likely at Level 4 as the educational institution
will ensure every student has equitable access to communication and information
resources, and the learning opportunities provided within the webfolio system.
- The expense
of the Level 4 webfolio is low as the student can assign and reassign access
to a variety of constituencies, she or he will modify items within the webfolio
system and have them instantly updated for all to see, and there is no delivery
cost to the student.
TABLE 4. provides
a summary of qualities used to describe webfolios at Maturation Level 4 – Mentoring
Leading to Mastery.
- At Level 5 webfolios
are organized by curricular requirements and electives or standards established
by a cadre of educators or the institution; and students can generate their
own portals for displaying work samples and achievements within the same curricular
structure or institutional standard.
- Work samples
and achievements can either be part of a working or a showcase webfolio.
- The delivery
of a student’s webfolio is instantaneous when he or she gives permission to
various groups of registered users who access the student’s work samples and
achievements.
- The Level 5
webfolio is of high value for students, educators and employers.
- The value to
the educator is high as he or she benefits greatly from the ability to repeat
and enhance instructional implementation by copying course syllabi and assignments
complete with links to standards and departmental goals and other taxonomies,
like higher order thinking, from one semester to the next, each time enriching
the content through additional resources and new curricular initiatives.
- The value to
employers is high as they are able to view the students’ showcase portfolios
with the benefit of contextual clues from the institution, the syllabi, the
assignments, help, resources, assessment criteria, and student generated descriptions
of their achievements.
- The value to
the educational institution is high as there is enhanced communication, involving
multi-media messages, between the student, the teacher, mentors, and significant
others such as recruiters and employers.
- The probability
of digital equity is highly likely at Level 5 as the educational institution
will ensure every student has equitable access to communication and information
resources, and the learning opportunities provided within the webfolio system.
- The expense
of the Level 5 webfolio is low as the student can assign and reassign access
to a variety of constituencies, she or he will modify items within the webfolio
system and have them instantly updated for all to see, and there is no delivery
cost to the student.
TABLE 5. provides
a summary of qualities used to describe webfolios at Maturation Level 5 – Authentic
Evidence as the Authoritative Evidence for assessment, evaluation and reporting.